Pull Requests
See Local Development for details on how to get started developing locally.
So you've got changes locally that address an issue? Fantastic!
Please do:
- Only send pull requests that resolve open, unassigned issues marked as
accepting prs
- One exception: extremely minor documentation typos
- Fill out the pull request template in full
- Validate your changes per Development > Validating Changes before un-drafting your PR
Please don't:
- Force push after opening a PR
- Reasoning: GitHub is not able to track changes across force pushes, which makes it take longer for us to perform incremental reviews
- Comment on an existing PR asking for updates
- Reasoning: Your PR hasn't been forgotten! The volunteer maintainers have limited time to work on the project, and they will get to it as soon as they are able.
- One exception: if a PR has been blocked on a question to a maintainer for 3 or more months, please ping us - we probably lost track of it.
- Reasoning: Your PR hasn't been forgotten! The volunteer maintainers have limited time to work on the project, and they will get to it as soon as they are able.
- Comment on a closed PR
- Reasoning: It is much easier for maintainers to not lose track of things if they are posted as issues. If you think there's a bug in typescript-eslint, the right way to ask is to file a new issue. The issue templates include helpful & necessary practices such as making sure you're on the latest version of all our packages. You can provide the link to the relevant PR to add more context.
Testing Changes
Code Coverage
We aim for 100% code coverage in all PRs when possible, except in the website/
package.
Coverage reports are generated locally whenever yarn test
is run.
The codecov
bot also comments on each PR with its percentage, as well as links to the line-by-line coverage of each file touched by the PR.
Granular Unit Tests
Most tests in most packages are set up as small, self-contained unit tests. We generally prefer that to keep tests and their failure reports granular.
For rule tests we recommend, when reasonable:
- Including both
valid
andinvalid
code changes in most PRs that affect rule behavior - Limiting to one error per
invalid
case
Raising the PR
Once your changes are ready, you can raise a PR! 🙌 The title of your PR should match the following format:
<type>(<package>): <short description>
You can find more samples of good past PR titles in recent commits to main
:
fix(scope-manager): correct handling for class static blocks
docs: fix links to getting started in README.md
Within the body of your PR, make sure you reference the issue that you have worked on, as well as pointing out anything of note you wish us to look at during our review.
We do not care about the number, or style of commits in your history, because we squash merge every PR into
main
. Feel free to commit in whatever style you feel comfortable with.
Tip: Send the PR from a branch other than
main
. See GitHub's Proposing Changes docs for more information.
type
Must be one of the following:
docs
- if you only change documentation, and not shipped codefeat
- for any new functionality additionsfix
- for any bug fixes that don't add new functionalitytest
- if you only change tests, and not shipped codechore
- anything else
package
The name of the package you have made changes within, (e.g. eslint-plugin
, parser
, typescript-estree
).
If you make significant changes across multiple packages, you can omit this (e.g.
feat: foo bar
).
short description
A succinct title for the PR.
Addressing Feedback and Beyond
With your PR raised and the CI passing, your PR will wait in the queue to be reviewed. We generally review PRs oldest to newest, unless we consider a newer PR higher priority (e.g. if it's a bug fix).
Once we have reviewed your PR, we will provide any feedback that needs addressing. If you feel a requested change is wrong, don't be afraid to discuss with us in the comments.
Please post comments as line comments when possible, so that they can be threaded. You can resolve conversations on your own when you feel they're resolved - no need to comment explicitly and/or wait for a maintainer.
Once you've addressed all our feedback by making code changes and/or started a followup discussion, re-request review from each maintainer whose feedback you addressed.
Once the feedback is addressed, and the PR is approved, we'll ensure the branch is up to date with main
, and merge it for you.
Updating Over Time
You generally don't need to keep merging commits from main
into your PR branch.
If you see merge conflicts or other intersections that worry you, then you can preemptively - but that's optional.
If we think merge conflicts need to be resolved in order to merge and/or review a PR, we might do that for you as a courtesy if we have time. If not, we may ask you to.
Asking Questions
If you need help and/or have a question, posting a comment in the PR is a great way to do so. There's no need to tag anybody individually. One of us will drop by and help when we can.
Thanks for reading through this file in full! Please include your favorite emoji at the bottom of your pull request to hint to us that you did in fact read this file. 💖 is a good starter if you're not sure which to use.